BT Review: WLAK (We Live As Kings)

Written by The Rap Up. Posted in Reviews, Spotlight, TRU Brain Trust

Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Published on March 05, 2013 with 15 Comments">15 Comments

wlak-cover-500

By quickly stacking its artist roster and adding one of TRU’s favorite producers (Wit) as an A&R, Collision Records is quickly emerging as one of the go-to labels for quality hip-hop made by rappers who are outspoken Christians. So when it was announced that the team would be producing a group album, we figured why not let our two most prominently Christian writers (and one expert of the Christian hip-hop subgenre on loan from Wade-O Radio) give us their take on the album? Did Swoope, Alex Faith, Christon Gray, and Dre Murray come off as kings or paupers? Read on.

Sketch

WLAK (aka We Live As Kings) takes a page out of the G.O.O.D. Music soundbook but colors slightly outside the lines with a more passionate embrace of Christian iconography and language heard on, say, Cruel Summer.

It’s refreshing to hear rappers show genuine respect to the faith and the album’s regal theme is strictly sustained throughout. (So much so that the song “YHWH” begins with Swoope ad libbing: “I wonder how many times we’re going to say the word ‘king’ on this album.”) But there’s a disappointing lack of personality coming through this particular collection of songs.

All of the WLAK members have revealed parts of their personas on other records, but a first-time listener may be left wondering exactly who Dre Murray, Swoope, Alex Faith, and Christon Gray are. Sure they’re royalty in the eyes of their God – but what else?

hats-off-3-0-small

david-daniels

While I’m unaware if WLAK shattered the record for acronyms on a record (see: “YHWH,” “ABNY” and “WLAQ”), it had me SMHing throughout. At least that’s my reaction to hearing lines as disgusting as Swoope’s “Here for a reason, not a contingency—was an empty seed, just a fetus formed with a Matt Damon-chemistry till the Trinity’s entity entered me with a re-Bourne identity.”

WLAK features all the strengths which made Collision Records’ previous release, Wake Up, a classic in many critics’ minds—lyrics that leave you shaking your head in admiration, replay value and a concept album so deep you’ll be embarrassed to play the radio’s shallow hip-pop with your windows down. It also eliminated, or at least diminished, the perceived weaknesses of its predecessor.

Wit’s A&R performance makes any questionable Wake Up mixing and mastering a distant memory. And if Swoope’s Kanye West/Lupe Fiasco-like sound really grates on your nerves, a collaboration effort with Dre Murray, Christon Gray and Alex Faith’s mesmerizing voices offers variety. WLAK somehow, someway, lived up to its sky-high king’s throne-high expectations.

hats-off-4-5-small

Aaron

WLAK’s self-titled debut aims to shine a light on what it means to be a Christian and have the Holy Spirit live through oneself. The lyrics are for and about Christ, but are accessible to those unfamiliar with Christian hip-hop. Namely, Dre Murray is the strongest rapper of the group, though everyone brings their A-game. WLAK is a group keen for wordplay, and the members convey their message through such. “They say when in Rome, do what Romans do/But this ain’t Rome, so we do what Romans do” Swoope raps on “ABNY (Marty McFly).”

Occasionally, WLAK becomes too self-righteous for its own good. “Reign is Coming” sounds somewhat insulting to non-believers. In particular, LeBron James is name-dropped multiple times on the album, which is probably because of his nickname, “King James.” While WLAK’s point about false kings is clear, the name-checking of the likes of LeBron James and Michael Jordan detracts from the compassionate feel that otherwise permeates the album.

Since WLAK is a rap album, I was surprised- though not unpleasantly so- that Christon Gray’s vocals often stole the show. His hook on “Long Way Down” is soulful and infectious, and he successfully carries a tune on multiple other songs. The only time the album’s singing falters is during the course of back-to-back songs “Eyes for You” and “WLAQ.” The two songs are a bit too similar for their own good; the themes and music should probably have been combined into one track.

While strong lyrics are in abundance throughout, WLAK is bogged down by hit-or-miss beats. In contrast to stronger, soul-tinged production on “Long Way Down” and “Arena” are ear-sores on tracks like “YHWH” and “All In.” The bland production on several songs is WLAK’s biggest drawback.

The members of WLAK are authentically Christian and authentically hip-hop. Their debut album showcases both strong lyricism and emotional honesty, but poor production on too many songs keeps this album from being a clear winner.

hats-off-3-0-small

  • Shauns_Love59

    I mean that’s NOT their goal. :-P

  • Shauns_Love59

    Sorry but I have to disagree with some of the statement, in which you guys are entitled to. I believe this project was absolutely great in spreading its message along with the music production. The main goal of spreading the gospel is not to have the artist heard but the Word of God. So of course, you’re not going to really get know each artist like “who are they?” for that’s their main goal for you to know who they are. They want you to get to know Christ.

    • http://www.sketchthejournalist.com Sketch the Journalist

      I understand your point but don’t think the two have to be mutually exclusive goals – especially when the project is viewed from a simple entertainment perspective and something I feel the artists have been able to better balance in their previous, individual album releases.

      We’re judging the art, not the heart. And in doing so, intent doesn’t outweigh execution.

  • http://twitter.com/zyonoyz [Insert name here]

    Wow, where do I begin. I don’t want to make this too long but I have to say I disagree with a few reviews here. “Bland-productions; this artist sounds like this and that; my ears can’t bear to hear such lyrics”. I just don’t see how people come off with such critical reviews of an artist with only a handful of paragraphs to back up their negative thoughts on how THEY think it should be. Artists such as these guys work hard, night and day, as lyricists, performers, producers, video editors, etc. and reviewers don’t always take those things into account. I’m sorry, but a few reviews from this list hold no weight in their argument. Perhaps we should view iTunes to check what the everyday listeners have to say; where we’ve put them on the charts. Users>reviews

    • Aaron

      “Bland production” is the only quote you got right. We were all very complimentary of the lyrics. You might want to give it another read-through before you comment and essentially do what you’re accusing us of doing. Reviews are subjective, so it’s obviously going to be the opinion of any given person. As for the brevity, TRU has long since practiced Brain Trusts, where different reviewers offer a summary of their take on a given album, so it’s a collection of opinions instead of one person’s view.

    • http://twitter.com/jmonkey Jaap van der Doelen

      You don’t have to agree with them but to say the reviewers didn’t argue their points is very much off-base. I can also assure you they’re very much aware of the efforts put into the work, which was offered to them for fair criticism, and they gave it just that.

      As for your sales > reviews argument, you don’t seriously want to go there, do you?

      • http://www.sketchthejournalist.com Sketch the Journalist

        Agreed.

  • Luke

    “Bland production”? What? The production on WLAK was easily as good if not better than pretty much every rap album I’ve ever listened to, even Gravity! When you have Wit, Swoope, Dirty Rice and Joseph Prienlozy on production there is no way that you can call it ‘bland’. “Earsores such as ‘All In and YHWH’, you need to get your ears checked if those are earsores, they were both two of the best produced tracks on the album.

    “Lack of personality”, wow, that’s why they all released albums/mixtapes before WLAK, so that the listener could get to know them, personality wasn’t the point of this album. If the listener wants to more personal things about them then they should get the past records, plain and simple. I would agree that Eyes for You and WLAQ could have been combined, but I believe that Eyes for You was meant to be a prelude for WLAQ, which would explain why the song is only 2:33 long.

    “Reign is Coming sounds somewhat insulting to non-believers” You’re going to have to explain that one to me, because plain and simple, that just doesn’t make sense. I just listened to it intently and heard nothing remotely ‘insulting’ to non believers.Just a song proclaiming that Jesus is coming to reign here on Earth.

    “I was surprised- though not unpleasantly so- that Christon’s vocals often stole the show” While Chris’s vocals were all amazing, I can’t agree that they ‘stole the show’, Swoope, Dre and Alex all killed this album, if you can find a verse on this album that one of them didn’t kill, let me know, because I felt that all were phenomonal.

    Really surprised by Sketch’s and Aaron’s reviews, from a personal view this album was a classic, and pretty much all other reviews that I’ve read think that it was great too. Of course we are all entitled to our own opinions, but many displayed in these reviews I have to disagree with and ask for a little more in depth support of the opinions.

    • Aaron

      That’s as much depth as you’re going to get with a BT review. As I stated before, the brevity is so that there can be multiple voices in the review, rather than just one person’s opinion. However, I respect your view and I appreciate that you are able to disagree without resorting to insulting us writers.

      • Luke

        Can you at least explain what made you find “Reign is Coming” insulting to non-believers? Out of all the statements, thats the one that I’m most confused about, production, and the others are personal opinions, but this one is just strange to me. I can be fairly confident in saying that there was no intent by WLAK to do so, from what I’ve read and listened to, these men are focused on spreading the gospel, so insulting non-believers would be a big issue. Just wondering what made you get that from the song.

        • Aaron

          “These boys make me wanna throw up/They say they kings but they really need to grow up/They say they Caesar boy, with a robe on they shoulders/but all I see is a boy in an oversized toga.” Sounds belittling to me. Not questioning WLAK’s faith, but that sounds judgmental and critical. “Me and him we ain’t one in the same/I do more than talk cars on tracks…” sounds like putting down secular rappers.

          • Luke

            I took the first line as a line against Catholics. Because of the mention of the robe (the pope and priests wear robes) that is how I took it. Is it belittling? Maybe, but IMHO I think that this is a major issue, that people try to elevate people over other people and consider them to be holy as the Catholics do with the Pope. 1 Samuel 2:2 says that no man is holy. Catholics need to get this message that they don’t live as kings because they do not have a true relationship with God. (Sorry if I sound judgemental, but Catholicism is a big pet peeve of mine, as their are many faults within their church). Swoope in this line is trying to show that people who think that they are in Christ and better than everyone else that that is simply not true.

            The second line I would agree that it does put down secular rap, but whats wrong with that? What would you rather hear about, girls, sex, vulgar language and drugs or the Gospel? Dre is proclaiming that their rap is edifing to the soul unlike other rappers who just “talk cars on tracks” and I completely agree with him.

          • Aaron

            You took the lines as you took them, and i took the lines as i took them. Different interpretations. I feel that any put-downs are detrimental to the album because they don’t match the compassionate feel of the rest of the album. Let’s chalk it up to a difference in opinion and call it a day.

  • http://twitter.com/TheRealBigOK Onsi Kamel

    I don’t completely agree with any of the reviews, but I agree to some extent with all of them. I think this album was a solid, 4-star album. Honestly, the production did leave much to be desired at times. It was not nearly as put together, groundbreaking, or cohesive as Wake Up. YHWH sounded like a lesser version of “Clique” regarding the production. The album did, however, have its moments of brilliance. But it left me wishing the whole album was filled with them.

    As for the whole insult point, perhaps those lines may be perceived that way. But given that Hip-Hop artists generally make it a mission to insult and demean opponents, it’s only natural that Collision will assert what they believe to be God’s way as superior to others’.

    I agree with the statement about lack of personality, however it seems to me that most if not all label projects fall prey to this problem (Cruel Summer, for example). Personality will be lost when multiple artists collaborate. The key is to create a new personality for the album. They tried to make their “King” personalities into the album’s personality.

    It was a very strong album, and will probably be among the best of 2013. 3 1/2 stars is not an insulting rating. Reasonable Doubt received 4 from several reviewers. At the end of the day, though, this album wets the appetite for more from Collision.

    • http://www.beatarkitekture.com/ DJ beatArkitekt

      Totally agree with you here. I felt it was a 3.75-4 star-ish album myself…very good, not insanely classic, but a solid well done project.